Toronto-Goth.com : making toronto a darker place
Writing << back | culture | writing | fiction | nonfiction | poetry |
Classical Music: The Ultimate Gothic Experience?

People often ask what it means to be a "goth". In this day and age it can mean almost anything to anyone. It seems like the only constant in the myriad of definitions is some connection to black clothing. But the root of the meaning comes from the Germanic tribes, the Goths, who used to wonder across Europe hundreds of years ago. Thus the term originally evolved from a means of qualifying something as barbaric or uncultured. People often use the term to describe architecture, in connection with the dark, oft cited "crude" buildings that were scorned by the Rennaissance set. This is in direct opposition to what many of us feel the real essence of being "gothic" is. For most it suggests a deep love of powerful, often dark emotions that are easily expressed through art. It seems to be apparent that souls that gravitate towards the gothic lifestyle have a deeper feeling for emotion than the average person, a kind of hyper-sensitivity. Often these feelings stem from a perceptio! n of being an outsider, someone who doesn't fit in, someone who is misundertood, someone that is different on the inside than they are on the outside, someone who is intricately complex yet quietly withdrawn and socially mute. There pervades a sense of sadness, a sense of depression in the gothic psyche and the therapy that is undertaken in the name of self-exploration and understanding often produces stunningly beautiful results. The clothing, paintings, music and writings of gothic experience are, despite being considered dark and morbid, infallibly flamboyant and wonderfully creative. It is this penchant for the extreme, the bizarre and the beautiful that fuels the minds of individuals that purvey gothic art.

When we search for an explanation to our emotions, we are often greeted by examples of others undergoing the same inner struggle. Misery loves company and it is true that we feel much better when we can identify our powerful sensitivities with others. When we find something that speaks to us, something that helps us make sense of our own confused world, we immediately latch onto it and identify with it as our own. Some of the most lasting and relevant of these emotional anchors are melodies. We all know how a certain song or melody can bring back stomach churning feelings from a time in our past. Many of us have songs that we can't bare to listen to because we so fully identify it with an experience and time period. Sound may be the single most powerful stimulus for the most repressed depths of our brain. Advertisers know this. The most common ad gimmick is the jingle, that catchy melody that identifies a product. By Menen. It's three notes and we all know them perfectly. But advertisers also know that there are certain melodies that have existed for hundreds of years, that are so powerful that they are a mainstay in the global culture as a whole. We hear them everyday. Ba-ba-ba-baaaa. Beethoven's fifth. There possibly isn't a person alive in the Western world today above the age of three that doesn't know that melody. Go out on the street for a few hours and try to find someone who has never heard it, it will be quite amazing how almost impossible it is (plus it's fun running around Yonge St. going "Hey what's this: Ba-ba-ba-baaaa!").

This kind of music, music that has lasted the test of time and weathered not only decades, but centuries, is so powerfully emotional and so perfectly expresses a feeling that it refuses to go away. Some classical music can absolutely tear at the soul. Even if you have no knowledge of Tchaikovsky, and you really aren't into classical music, give his Sixth Symphony a chance. Have a listen. It's hard not to be moved. It is the cry of a tortured soul. If you really shut everything else out and feel the music you will peer into the life of a man that suffered in anguish. He was a homosexual in19th century Russia where being gay was a crime punishable by death. He lived most of his life in financial turmoil, relying on the handouts of benefactors. He never loved, he was denied the opportunity to be with the kind of person he wanted, although he had so much passion and love in his soul. He was the quintessential outsider, the misunderstood genius; he personified the idea of the dark, troubled artist whose emotions fuel his massive talent. His music is so heart-wrenching, so achingly tragic that it is used as the background to almost every love scene on television and in the movies that we see. You know that music they always play? The stuff that is in the background when the two lovers run towards each other across the fields? That's the theme from Tchaikovsky's Romeo and Juliet. It works without fail. Hollywood knows this. It's just way too effective. Some classical music is so dark and powerful that it is amongst the most disturbing sound ever committed to paper. So, we think that C-tec or download is pretty dark and chaotic? Try listening to some of the more far out stuff by Bela Bartok, Sergei Prokofiev or Arnold Schoenberg. It's so scary that Marilyn Manson has to put a nite-lite on while listening to it. It's the soundtrack to Horror movies. In fact, the music to the final scene in Carl Maria Von Weber's Opera Die Frieschultz, was so devilish and creepy that it inspired the term "Gothic Horror". People fainted, riots broke out, Fred Durst had nothing to do with any of it, not even the arson. If we want to hear something morbid, that probes the depths of the most dark disturbed souls, we should seek out some of this stuff. It may make you reassess how evil you really are.

It is true that the great composers may be considered amongst the greatest goths of all time, too. Most of them were extremely misunderstood. They lived in torment, slaves to their passion and sensibilities. Their depth of emotion gripped them and urged them to create, to seek their own therapy and exorcise some of the demons that lay within them. This is what we hear in their music. Mozart's final, unfinished composition is his Requiem- a death mass. Mozart was a radical, flamboyant, out-of-control rebel that loathed the shackles clasped onto him by society. If he was alive today he would probably be yelling at police from a street car, clad in pvc pants and leather gauntlets. He was obsessed with his music and had little respect for anything else. His relentless drive for creation ultimately drove him to his death and, in his requiem, we can hear the sounds of a man dying in his bed, racing to finish his opus. Beethoven's final compositions suggest a man half insane with the premise that he is losing his livelihood, his gift is eroding, his only true love in life is rotting away. Beethoven also was a very misunderstood man. He was difficult to get along with. He was fiery and prone to mood swings. He was often cripplingly depressed and frustrated with the world. He was like a lot of people along Queen St. W. He wore tons of black lipstick and nail polish (ok, so this is speculation, but they may have had cosmetics like that in 18th Century Vienna). Aesthetically, the classical period (and later) lent itself to a very gothic atmosphere. Everybody was riding around in carriages wearing clothing that strikingly resembled the front window of Siren and Heretic. Absinthe was the drink of the 19th century aristocratic artist. Long, flowing coats and corsetted dresses were the mainstream fashion. People went to masquerade balls in castles and palaces. The musicians were right in the centre of all this fashion and extravagance. It molded their images. It made them mysterious and dark. In fact, it is probably from this time period that the myth of musicians selling their souls to the devil propagated. Possibly this was attributable to the church, who were of the opinion that music be used only to praise God and that improvisation, flamboyance and embellishment were self-righteous and sinful. They were probably just bitter about guys throwing thirds into their nice perfect harmonic intervals of fourths and fifths, but that's for! the theory guys to ponder. It is true, however, that Niccolo Paganini was generally accepted as being in league with the devil, what with his long dark hair, flamboyant clothes, virtuostic playing and the fact that women screamed and fainted at his performances. Evil, dark guys like him used to hang out at the Sanctuary. They used to smoke cloves. Coincidentally, Clove cigarettes were being imported by the Dutch East India company from Thailand for smoking by the trendy, theatre going set. At the exact same time Mozart was writing his death mass (can we get more gothic?), the Marquis de Sade was dreaming up stories that would delight the populace of the Reverb on the third Saturday of the month. Paris was ablaze with stories that Trent Reznor revisited in his broken videos. Excess and debauchery were everywhere. It was a fun time (and the girls looked great). This idea of the classical composer as ultimate goth is shared today by some of the most revered figures in the 21st century gothic community. Our Black Princes and Dark Queens pay homage to the men and women that poured out so much of their souls over the past 300 years. Trent Reznor began as a classical pianist and his song structure and arrangements follow the formula of some of the greatest classical pieces. He himself cites many of the great composers as his biggest source of inspiration (along with Skinny Puppy and Front 242, of course). Ian Curtis loved Chopin. Ian Astbury has a passion for Opera. The list goes on and on.

What with it's evil, dark characters; its deeply emotive and powerfully expressive composers; the melodies that have lasted centuries; the agony, torment and sadness of generations of misunderstood and its testament to the greatest goth artists of today, classical music stands as one of the most gothic of all artforms. So, next time you want to go out on the town for an inextricably "gothic experience" dress in your best velvet shirt and darkest vinyl pants, wear your corset, take your lover to a dark, moody restaurant, order lots of red wine, then stagger over to a TSO performance of something by one of these time tested goth composers- you'll be glad you did, and you may even have an experience and enjoy emotions that you can revisit whenever you want, just by dropping a disc into the stereo and pressing "Play".

written by Ian
for www.toronto-goth.com
posted Aug 5th 2001

Note: send your comments to the author and tg staff using the form below and they will be posted here. If you would like to comment only to the author, click on his name above to email.

 Name:
 Email:
 Keep name/email private?:
 Comments:    
   
you will be taken back to the main
writing page after you submit the form


an anon person writes: Classical music expresses music from a wide and varied emotional perspective. Many classical pianists were infact manic-depressives, which is a horrible illness, and in no way 'evil', as you call it.

Listening to Pachelbel's Kanon makes your soul want to burst out in tears of joy and compassion, while Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D Minor instills a morbid sense of gothic transcendance but at the same time the rigid complexities of the piece still manage to bring out a nearly overpowering sense of joy.

Thats all it is, is pure genuis. Gothic? What is Gothic, it is defined by you. The great gothic cathederals themselves are infact no evil and scary, even with there fine gargoyals, because evil is what you choose to define it as.

They are the most beautiful structures, dedicated to the glory of God, who we really have no idea about. And is God something gothic people are supposed to be turned off to, as well? Why is this? Because Christianiy has given God a bad name, and made many atheists out of well intentioned folk.

No my friends, there could be no God who would let these things go on. Yet the suffering in this human world, is not caused by God, it is caused by not accepting God, rather they are creations of the human ego....

Some great sprititual teachers say that was it comical about the atheist saying he doesn't believe in God, is that it is the God within that lets the atheist say that.

Anyways, what is Gothic? What is the point in trying to be evil... I like what you said about emotions though, but it is not something soley owned by a few individuals. However, it is true I do think that such powerful emotions riveting through one, of compassion, empathy, or at the other end of the spectrum, agony and seperation, are truly experienced directly, by few individuals.

Hopefully through compassion for one another we can aspire to forgive each other for whatever judgements we hold, because in truth, all judgements are really self judgements... and with that said, the healing process begins.

Beautiful..(July 3 02)

matt writes: fuck you i just want gothic music!!! i am your consumer!!! and ill never join anything. (September 11 02)

hag thorn writes: Enjoyed your article and you must check out Rachmaninoff. (09/04/01)

Elzaryd writes: Hey- Good article. I liked the development. I see nowhere in there where you claim that the classical period was sufferring from "Victorian Morals", it seems to me you made it clear it was pretty loose. Plus, Beethoven was NOT a Romantic Composer- he was Classical (and who bickers over capitalization anymore?) Plus, saying Rebel's music is more emotional than Mozart's is pretty bold, seeing as how subjective emotion is. Anon got more wrong than you did in his criticism, so don't worry about it, bro! Keep writing- I like your style :) (09/04/01)

Lady Sun writes: Hi Ian, I haven't even read anon's diatribe in full yet; however, I would like to say or remind that although it appears the feedback wasn't positive - it does let you know that your article "inspired" a response and as writer's and artist's - this is a high achievement. Also, if there is any truth to his words, no matter how distasteful the delivery of their message already appears to me, take some time to look at it as a growth opportunity.
I stand my ground and again thank you for the article, even if it wasn't "technically proficient" (if that was even the case) and I hope to read more of your words in the future.
Warm regards,
Lady Sun.
(08/31/01)

anon writes: I have no idea where you got your information on Mozart (probably from watching Amadeus too many times!) The 18th century was NOT a time of stiffling social conventions. It would only appear such to one who is not familiar with the era, its literature, its art and its daily life. It was not until the 1850's that the social climate became crystalized into well established (more narrow) and constricted modes and social norms of behavior. Oddly it is this Victorian image of hyper-propriety that comes to the popular mind when trying to fathom times before c.1920. This is what happens when you filter history through Goth club denizens.
18th century society allowed for far more liberal and individualistic modes of self-expression then the Victorian era allowed. What "shackles" was Mozart supposed rebelling against? The 18th century was extremly loose moraled even by todays standards. The image of Mozarty as enfant terrible may appeal but it is without substance. In short you have confused and transposed your historical perceptions and layered on your desired image onto the template of history.
The system of patronage that was the bread and butter of any endeavour undertaken in those days would have been familliar and "normal" to a person in Mozart's time. It made possible artistic freedom and experimentation far more then it curtailed it. Also, Mozart, while his audiences for his operas were from all the classes (this was a time when fist fights would break out while waiting for tickets) he required "sponsorship" from the nobility. That he got money from his patrons was less a result of his musical ability (which was not hyped to its current level unilt more recent times) for even Mozart had his fair share of "flops" (that are now considered "masterpieces") but from his ability to move in the circles of the upper classes. In a city the size of 18th century Vienna, anything along the lines of "punk rock" behavior (shouting from street cars, etc.) would have jepordized Mozart's cash flow. Any cheeky behaviour that Mozart may or may not have got up too was no worse or better then what his betters did. Indeed it was the upper classes' indiscretions and decadence that Mozart and any other would-be ladder climber would emulate. The nobility's bad behaviour set the tone, everbody else followed suit as best they could afford.
Mozart's music is only emotionaly driven (and the product of an "out-of-control-mind) to a modern ear. The Classical (note the capitol "C") musical era was the peak refinement of what had started in the Baroque period (before 1750), where the single overwhelming characterisitc is ORDER. LOGICAL, COOL, CALCULATED, RATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, ORDER. Mozart is renowned because he could make music that fit said mold and do it better then most of his contemporaries. In the 1720's J.F. Rebel composed a collection of pieces that told the story of Creation from Chaos to God making the seas and land and whatnot. It plays far more "emotionaly" then any catchy little ditty Mozart wrote. Indeed the pieces are arguably decades ahead of their time. At first listen they seem to not be from the Baroque age of Vivaldi and Bach at all but from Beethoven's Romantic mold (Beethoven is a Romantic composer, not a Classical one) What did audiences think? THEY HATED IT!! 18th century audiences were not receptive to emotional music, it simply wasn't "in" then. Mozarts music is fine for the Looney Toons and commercial jingles, but it remains complex, ordered, neat and tidy. Not that pristeen order can't stir the soul, it is simply not the intent.
Listen to Classical music. Listen to Romantic music. Listen to Baroque music if you've got the breeding for it but for God's sake don't twist or make up a historical revision to suit your modern sentiments. And do your bloody homework! (08/27/01)

darkayngel writes: As much as I love the last few decades' creations... listening to Chopin, Mozart or a million other composers i cant spell or pronounce or remember their names... :) (08/18/01)

Lady Sun writes: Wonderful article. Riveting. I felt at home, accepted, understood and approved. :) Classical music & the 19 century has always been a big interest and influence of mine. I'm trying to understand my goth self better and this helped me!
Keep writing. I love the way you lead the reader to your goal. (08/16/01)

Sekhmet writes: Wow! I loved this article. Music, specifically classical, is something that i have dedicated my life too and it is so wonderful to see someone writing about what i have always felt.. that classical music is the quintessential goth experience.. its pure emotion. I would also suggest that anyone into early music check out John Dowland..i have a feeling he spent much of his time clad in black doublets. :) (08/06/01)

Morgan writes: Kick ass article. And I thought I was the only one who thought classical music was freakier than Manson's stuff. (03/10/02)


Toronto-Goth Discussion List
hundreds of local members
toronto-goth list rules & regs

01
01

other articles and news: click here

want to contribute your writing (stories or poetry)? fill out this form. full credit is given to authors.

find out more about the services offered by this site, including chat, free email, free webspace, discussion forum, and more



| main | about | services | events | community | clubs | shops | culture | attractions | news | reviews | help | links | contact |
<< back © copyright 1999 - 2001 toronto-goth.com™. all rights reserved

toronto goth
toronto-goth banner exchange